Technology

Juries to be scrapped in thousands of cases, David Lammy confirms

2025-12-02 13:45
659 views
Juries to be scrapped in thousands of cases, David Lammy confirms

The justice secretary outlined ‘bold but necessary’ reforms including scrapping juries in cases that could have a likely sentence of three years or less

  1. News
  2. UK
  3. UK Politics
Juries to be scrapped in thousands of cases, David Lammy confirms

The justice secretary outlined ‘bold but necessary’ reforms including scrapping juries in cases that could have a likely sentence of three years or less

David MaddoxPolitical EditorTuesday 02 December 2025 13:45 GMTCommentsVideo Player PlaceholderCloseDavid Lammy announces 'swift courts' in justice reformBrexit and beyond

Sign up to our free Brexit newsletter for our analysis of the continuing impact of Brexit on the UK

Sign up to our free newsletter for the latest analysis on Brexit's impact

Sign up to our free newsletter for the latest analysis on Brexit's impact

Brexit and beyondEmail*SIGN UP

I would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice

David Lammy has announced the creation of new “swift courts” which will see a judge decide verdicts in thousands of cases.

As part of sweeping reforms to the criminal court system, the justice secretary unveiled plans to scrap juries in so-called either-way cases that could have a likely sentence of three years or less.

This would include offences such as affray, theft and fraud. Serious offences including murder, robbery and rape, will still go before a jury.

Mr Lammy, who is also deputy prime minister, said the reforms were “bold but necessary” after current projections showed that case loads would reach 100,000 by 2028.

David Lammy has announced reforms to the criminal justice system (Jacob King/PA)open image in galleryDavid Lammy has announced reforms to the criminal justice system (Jacob King/PA) (PA Wire)

After the proposals were announced, Lord Chief Justice Sir Brian Leveson, who recommended a series of proposals to tackle the court backlog, described the justice system as being “on the brink of collapse”. He broadly welcomed the plans but cautioned that there is “no silver bullet” to deal with the crisis.

The Conservatives described the proposals as the “beginning of the end of jury trials”.

Announcing his criminal court reform in the Commons, Mr Lammy said: "I will create new swift courts within the crown court with a judge alone deciding verdicts in trial of either way cases with a likely sentence of three years or less as Sir Brian (Leveson) recommends.

"Sir Brian [Leveson] estimates that they will deliver justice at least 20 per cent faster than jury trials, and whilst jury deliberations remain confidential, judges provide reasoning for their verdicts in open courts, so this will hardwire transparency in our new approach."

Sir Brian Leveson came up with a series of recommendations on court reformopen image in gallerySir Brian Leveson came up with a series of recommendations on court reform (PA)

He said the system will take “years to fix”. “The changes I’m proposing will require legislation, it will take time to implement. Our investment will also need time to have an effect,” he said.

“But we are pulling every possible lever to move to in a positive direction and my ambition for the backlog to start coming down by the end of this Parliament remains.”

Responding to Mr Lammy, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick accused him of “twisted logic” and pointed out that he himself had opposed removing the right to a jury trial.

He accused him of “ripping up Magna Carta” and of abandoning his principles while in government having previously defended juries.

"This year alone 21,000 court sitting days have been missed and the court backlog is up 10 per cent on their watch," he said. “Instead of depriving British citizens of ancient liberties, David Lammy should get his own department in order."

Labour MPs also warned against the reforms amid concerns they would water down people’s legal rights.

Eltham and Chislehurst MP Clive Efford warned it will “create and us and them” situation in the legal system, while Stella Creasy said: “I think many of us will worry whether the justice secretary’s prescription is the solution because as he points out jury trials account for less than 3 per cent of cases.”

According to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ), nearly half of the cases in the backlog are related to violent and sexual offences, and only about 3 per cent of criminal cases are currently heard with a judge and a jury.

Leeds MP Richard Burgon said the reforms “send a chill through my heart.”

Diane Abbott warned it will be the poorest who will be denied justice as a result. She said: “The entire House is concerned about victims. But the entire House is also concerned about men and women who are undoubtedly suffering miscarriages of justice if the right to trial by jury is curtailed.”

Meanwhile, a judge at Winchester Crown Court said she believed juries were necessary for their “objectivity”, minutes after Mr Lammy gave his statement.

Thanking the jury which sat on a rape trial, Judge Jane Miller KC, who is sitting in retirement, said: “Those of us who sit in this court think the only way cases like this could be tried is by a jury, and not just these types of cases.

“We think a jury brings an objectivity to cases like these which those involved in cases like this all the time cannot do.”

As part of the reforms, £550 million will also be given to victim support services over the next three years to help survivors and witnesses through the justice process, such as through counselling and advice on attending court.

Incoming victims' commissioner Claire Waxman, who will take up the role in the new year, welcomed the MoJ funding as a "necessary step", but added: "The sums pledged are not a silver bullet for the wider crisis facing the sector."

"Ultimately, these services are crucial to a victim's recovery - and they will be just as essential to the recovery of the justice system as a whole," she said.

Former Law Society president Richard Atkinson said the extra funding was welcome but "only papers over the cracks and doesn't address the fundamental problems".

The Bar Council has previously urged Mr Lammy not to replace juries with single judges, warning that doing so could damage public trust.

Sir Brian, chair of the Independent Review of Criminal Courts, said: “In more than fifty years working in the criminal justice system, I have never seen pressure on the courts at such an unacceptable level.

“The rising backlog in the Crown Court means victims, witnesses and defendants are waiting months, sometimes years, for cases to come to trial – unable to move on with their lives. It is no exaggeration to say that the system stands on the brink of collapse.”

More about

David LammyMagistratesJustice SecretaryMagna CartaDeputy Prime MinisterjudgesCourts

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Most popular

    Popular videos

      Bulletin

        Read next