BTC 72,807.00 +6.62%
ETH 2,134.55 +7.66%
S&P 500 6,869.50 +0.78%
Dow Jones 48,739.41 +0.49%
Nasdaq 22,807.48 +1.29%
VIX 21.15 -10.27%
EUR/USD 1.09 +0.15%
USD/JPY 149.50 -0.05%
Gold 5,151.60 +0.33%
Oil (WTI) 76.11 +1.94%
BTC 72,807.00 +6.62%
ETH 2,134.55 +7.66%
S&P 500 6,869.50 +0.78%
Dow Jones 48,739.41 +0.49%
Nasdaq 22,807.48 +1.29%
VIX 21.15 -10.27%
EUR/USD 1.09 +0.15%
USD/JPY 149.50 -0.05%
Gold 5,151.60 +0.33%
Oil (WTI) 76.11 +1.94%

California introduces age verification law for all operating systems, including Linux and SteamOS — user age verified during OS account setup

| 2 Min Read
The law's broad definition of an "operating system provider" pulls in not just Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, but Linux distributions and Valve's SteamOS.

California introduces age verification law for all operating systems, including Linux and SteamOS — user age verified during OS account setup

Steam cover art
(Image credit: Valve)

California's Digital Age Assurance Act (AB 1043), signed by Governor Gavin Newsom in October 2025, requires every operating system provider in California to collect age information from users at account setup and transmit that data to app developers via a real-time API, with the law taking effect on January 1, 2027.

The law's broad definition of an "operating system provider" — anyone who "develops, licenses, or controls the operating system software on a computer, mobile device, or any other general purpose computing device" — pulls in not just Windows, macOS, Android, and iOS, but Linux distributions and Valve's SteamOS.

According to AB 1043, OS providers must maintain a "reasonably consistent real-time application programming interface" that categorizes users into four age brackets — under 13, 13 to under 16, 16 to under 18, and 18 or older — and hand that signal to any developer who requests it when their app is downloaded or launched.

Google Preferred Source

Follow Tom's Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.

Luke James
Contributor

Luke James is a freelance writer and journalist.  Although his background is in legal, he has a personal interest in all things tech, especially hardware and microelectronics, and anything regulatory. 

  • Notton
    I love being punished for a mistake someone else made. /s
    It's like parental controls for everyone, doesn't matter if you have none yourself.

    eCtWeNwOb9w
    Reply
  • PEnns
    This is stupid on many levels.

    And the best part?? "The law does not require photo ID uploads or facial recognition, with users instead simply self-reporting their age"
    Yeah, sure, It's not April 1st, but it still sounds like a lame joke!
    Reply
  • rluker5
    Dumb because:
    1. Family computers. Not everyone has a PC for everyone in the house.
    2. Rufus, Tiny10. Will mods no longer be possible?

    At least they act like they believe their heart is in the right place, even if reality says they are only doing harm to those less fortunate.

    The law is probably just to open the door for more lawsuits to raise the wages of lawyers.
    Reply
  • -Fran-
    If I'm reading this correctly, they just want the OS to ask "hey, are you old enough?" without further confirmation or validation, right?

    If so, then this is a rather moot thing from a usability perspective.

    The only silver lining is now there should be a somewhat centralised way for the OS to tell host sofware "the user is old enough" and save us some hassle per-app? Perhaps?

    And yeah... The Linux ecosystem will have issues adapting to this.

    Regards.
    Reply
  • WonkoTheSaneUK
    If the requirement is simply to self-report, then 99% of Linux users will share 1/1/1970 as their birthdate.
    (That's when Linux's clock counts from)
    Reply
  • marmastr
    as someone not from California, this is not to protect kids
    Reply
  • flytrap23
    Notton said:
    I love being punished for a mistake someone else made. /s
    It's like parental controls for everyone, doesn't matter if you have none yourself.

    eCtWeNwOb9w
    How are you being punished?
    Reply
  • wshwe
    You must be referring to Florida, Texas or Mississippi.
    Reply
  • USAFRet
    And what is this supposed to protect against?
    Reply
  • Zaranthos
    Why does my grandma's used computer think she's 13 and can't log into her apps? Oops.

    Full of fail.
    Reply

Comments

Please sign in to comment.
Rampagefang Market Intelligence