- Sport
- Racing
A panel concluded that Dylan Kitts prevented his horse from winning a race at Worcester in July 2023
Molly HunterMonday 24 November 2025 11:36 GMTComments
Dylan Kitts has been given a nine-year ban (Tim Goode/PA Wire)
Sign up to Independent Racing with Jonathan Doidge for expert tips, insider news and all the latest from the track
Get expert tips with Jonathan Doidge’s Racing newsletter
Get expert tips with Jonathan Doidge’s Racing newsletter
Email*SIGN UPI would like to be emailed about offers, events and updates from The Independent. Read our Privacy notice
A conditional jockey has been handed a nine-year ban after an independent British Horseracing Authority (BHA) disciplinary panel concluded he deliberately attempted to prevent his horse, Hillsin, from winning a race at Worcester in July 2023.
Dylan Kitts, who has since left the racing industry, received the lengthy suspension, backdated to the start of his interim suspension on 13 July 2023.
The panel determined that Kitts had been "groomed" by John Higgins, an associate of the horse’s owner Alan Clegg, and was therefore "not the prime mover in the conspiracy."
Higgins, identified as the instigator behind the scheme, has been on the BHA exclusion list since 7 March last year.
His 12-year ban has been backdated to that date, a consequence of his failure to cooperate with the disciplinary process.
Trainer Chris Honour was also implicated and fined £750 for misleading stewards after the race, though he was not deemed a driving force in the plot.
In a statement released on Monday, the BHA underscored the severity of the penalties.
"The penalties handed down to John Higgins and Dylan Kitts today for conspiring to prevent Hillsin from winning sends a clear message that British racing will not tolerate conduct of this kind," the statement read.
It emphasised that running and riding horses to achieve their best possible position is the minimum standard expected, crucial for maintaining public confidence in the sport's integrity.
The BHA highlighted that the actions of Higgins and Kitts undermined the efforts of thousands dedicated to upholding British racing's reputation for fair competition.
The investigation was described as "extensive in its nature, not dissimilar to a complex fraud case," involving significant evidence analysis, numerous interviews, and the first-time use of telephone data extraction powers.
The BHA welcomed the sanctions, stating they reflect the seriousness of the breach and the commitment to ensuring a clean and fair sport.
More about
British Horseracing AuthorityWorcesterinvestigationJoin our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments
