Technology

Over 300,000 People Could Get Up to $3,000 Payments After Court Takes Case

2025-11-25 12:03
870 views

Governor Mike DeWine previously ended the unemployment program early, causing Ohioans to not receive an additional $900 million.

Suzanne BlakeBy Suzanne Blake

Reporter, Consumer & Social Trends

ShareNewsweek is a Trust Project member

More than 300,000 Ohio residents could earn up to $3,000 after the state Supreme Court makes a decision on the state’s COVID-19 unemployment benefits.

Governor Mike DeWine previously ended the unemployment program early, causing Ohioans to not receive an additional $900 million in federal payments.

Why It Matters

The federal government approved eligible workers' unemployment benefits to be sent out by each state respectively.

While lower courts have ruled that DeWine broke state law by stopping the benefits early, a state Supreme Court reinforcement of these decisions could see thousands of dollars back in residents’ hands.

...

What To Know

An extra $900 million in federal COVID-19 unemployment benefits will be sent to qualifying Ohio residents if the state agrees with the lower court decisions.

DeWine stopped the payments early, but a Franklin County judge ordered the funds sent out in February, and another Tenth District Court of Appeals upheld that decision in June.

“Ohioans are seeking restitution after the state’s expanded unemployment benefits program was cut short by Governor DeWine,” Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. “The case reached the state’s Supreme Court after lower courts ruled that the governor may have violated state law by refusing to distribute federal funds designated for those benefits.”

The governor initially ended the program 10 weeks before it was slated to stop due to concerns that the extra benefits were contributing to labor shortages. More than 300,000 state residents were originally scheduled to get benefits through September 2021.

According to plaintiffs, the law mandates that the governor had to distribute the federal benefits when available, no matter any other possible labor considerations.

“This isn't really about whether the money helped or hurt the economy back then,” Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek. “It's about whether a promise made is a promise kept. Governor DeWine argued the extra $300 weekly discouraged work and tightened labor markets. That's a policy call. But Ohio law from the 1930s doesn't give governors wiggle room on that. It mandates accepting federal unemployment dollars.”

What People Are Saying

Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: “These benefits would have helped Ohioans keep up with rent and other essential expenses during the COVID-19 shutdowns. While it’s possible to get these payments, unspent Covid-19 dollars were required to be sent back to the federal government, so getting those funds back may be another hurdle. Furthermore, many who needed the aid back then have already faced evictions or defaults that can’t be undone.”

Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: “For more than 300,000 Ohio residents, this case is an important one. During the pandemic era, an additional $300 a week was allocated to those receiving unemployment benefits, but the state's Governor's decision to end those extra payments early due to labor shortages has been a huge point of controversy in the years since.”

Michael Ryan, a finance expert and the founder of MichaelRyanMoney.com, told Newsweek: “From a household finance perspective, this case matters less for the retroactive windfall and more for what it says about emergency safety nets. When unemployment benefits get caught in political and legal limbo for years, families learn the hard lesson: You can't count on the safety net being there when you fall.”

What Happens Next

The state Supreme Court voted to hear the case as a near-unanimous decision.

“While many will see this as a case of whether or not money is owed, it's more on did the governor break the law by halting payments early,” Beene said. “The decision could have long-term effects in future situations where state resources are allocated for specific needs during periods like the pandemic.”

Request Reprint & LicensingSubmit CorrectionView Editorial & AI GuidelinesGoogle Preferred Source BannerAdd Newsweek as a preferred source on Google to see more of our trusted coverage when you search.

Recommended For You

Trump May Defeat Maduro Without Battle and Lose War in VenezuelaNewsTrump May Defeat Maduro Without Battle and Lose War in Venezuela14 min readUncommon Knowledge: Trans Book Bans Often Backfire—On Their CreatorsNewsUncommon Knowledge: Trans Book Bans Often Backfire—On Their Creators5 min readUrgent Tornado Warning Issued, Severe Storms Threaten Mississippi, Louisiana: Live UpdatesNewsUrgent Tornado Warning Issued, Severe Storms Threaten Mississippi, Louisiana: Live Updates1 min readWoman Faces Deportation After Allegedly Throwing Coffee on BabyNewsWoman Faces Deportation After Allegedly Throwing Coffee on Baby3 min readPrice Correction ‘Worse Than 2008’ Coming To US Housing Market—AnalystNewsPrice Correction ‘Worse Than 2008’ Coming To US Housing Market—Analyst5 min readTrump Caught in China’s Flashpoint Dispute With Key US AllyWorldTrump Caught in China’s Flashpoint Dispute With Key US Ally4 min read

Related Podcasts

Top Stories

Trump Peace Plan: Ukraine Agrees To ‘Core Terms’, Russia Launches Major Attack—Live UpdatesWorldTrump Peace Plan: Ukraine Agrees To ‘Core Terms’, Russia Launches Major Attack—Live Updates3 min readTrump May Defeat Maduro Without Battle and Lose War in VenezuelaNewsTrump May Defeat Maduro Without Battle and Lose War in Venezuela14 min readThanksgiving Travel Live Updates: Winter Storm Threatens Record Travel, Flight Tracker, ForecastsLive BlogThanksgiving Travel Live Updates: Winter Storm Threatens Record Travel, Flight Tracker, Forecasts2 min readWhite House Speaks Out After Woman Set on Fire on Chicago SubwayCrimeWhite House Speaks Out After Woman Set on Fire on Chicago Subway4 min readBlack Friday Spending to Fall for First Time in YearsNewsBlack Friday Spending to Fall for First Time in Years5 min readFBI Interviewing Democrats Trump Has Called ‘Seditious’PoliticsFBI Interviewing Democrats Trump Has Called ‘Seditious’4 min read

Trending

Winter Storm Alert Issued as 12 Inches of Snow Set To HitNational Weather ServiceWinter Storm Alert Issued as 12 Inches of Snow Set To Hit3 min readFull List of Degrees Not Classed As ‘Professional’ by Trump AdminHigher EducationFull List of Degrees Not Classed As ‘Professional’ by Trump Admin8 min readNew ‘Cash Law’ Could Change Grocery Store RulesMoneyNew ‘Cash Law’ Could Change Grocery Store Rules3 min readCampbell’s Soup VP Mocks ‘Poor People’ Who Buy Its Food in Secret RecordingLawsuitCampbell’s Soup VP Mocks ‘Poor People’ Who Buy Its Food in Secret Recording6 min readHome Depot Responds to Thanksgiving BoycottThanksgivingHome Depot Responds to Thanksgiving Boycott5 min read

Opinion

GOP Rep.: The U.S. Must Close Critical AI Chip Export Loophole Exploited by China | OpinionOpinionGOP Rep.: The U.S. Must Close Critical AI Chip Export Loophole Exploited by China | Opinion5 min readAgriculture Secretary: Giving Thanks to the American Farmer This Thanksgiving | OpinionOpinionAgriculture Secretary: Giving Thanks to the American Farmer This Thanksgiving | Opinion4 min readFormer White House Middle East Envoy: What We Keep Getting Wrong About the UAE and Sudan | OpinionOpinionFormer White House Middle East Envoy: What We Keep Getting Wrong About the UAE and Sudan | Opinion5 min readGovernment-Mandated Affordability—Music to Consumer Ears | OpinionOpinionGovernment-Mandated Affordability—Music to Consumer Ears | Opinion6 min readConventional Wisdom: Ukraine Peace Plan EditionOpinionConventional Wisdom: Ukraine Peace Plan Edition2 min read